When we walk into a psychotherapist’s office for the first time, we usually carry something fragile with us — a story we haven’t shared with anyone, a pain we struggle to name, or simply exhaustion from trying to cope alone. The therapeutic relationship is the space where that fragile thing can finally be spoken aloud. But precisely because it carries such weight, this relationship is fundamentally different from every other relationship in our lives — and that is exactly why it needs clear boundaries.
What makes the therapeutic relationship special
At first glance, therapy looks like a conversation between two people. In reality, though, it is something quite different from friendship, family closeness, or even a medical consultation.
First, the relationship is deeply asymmetrical. The client shares intimate details of their life — fears, traumas, family secrets, moments of shame — while the therapist remains relatively “unknown,” revealing little or nothing personal about themselves. This asymmetry is not accidental — it is a condition for the work itself. Precisely because the therapist does not bring their own emotional burden into the room, they can be genuinely present for the client, without the conversation turning into an exchange of favors or a friendly “you for me, me for you.”
Second, the relationship is oriented entirely around the client’s needs. Unlike friendship, where both sides mutually support each other and expect reciprocity, the therapeutic relationship exists for a single purpose — the client’s wellbeing. The therapist does not come to a session to receive support, advice, or company.
Third, it takes place in a context of trust and vulnerability combined with a certain kind of power. The therapist holds professional knowledge, experience, and to some degree influence over how the client comes to understand themselves and their experiences. This is not inherently a bad thing — that very expertise is the reason people seek help in the first place. But every form of power carries with it a responsibility not to be misused.
It is precisely this combination of deep closeness, asymmetry, and trust that makes the therapeutic relationship both extraordinarily valuable and potentially vulnerable to violations if it is not carefully protected.
Why specific rules exist
Boundaries in therapy are not arbitrary bureaucratic requirements — they flow directly from the nature of the relationship described above.
Boundaries protect the client. A person who is emotionally dependent or vulnerable at a given point in their life can easily develop a strong attachment to their therapist — a phenomenon known as transference. Clear boundaries help keep that attachment within a safe, therapeutic channel, rather than letting it become a source of new pain or confusion.
Boundaries protect the therapeutic process itself. Therapy works because the space is predictable and stable — a set time, a set place, set rules for communication outside sessions. When this frame stays consistent, the client can focus on their inner work instead of worrying about uncertainty in the relationship.
Boundaries protect the therapist as well. Clear rules shield the practitioner from burnout, from confusion about their own role, and from situations in which their personal needs might imperceptibly become entangled with the work.
This is why professional organizations around the world — and good practice in Bulgaria as well — set out specific guidelines: on confidentiality, on contact outside sessions, on financial arrangements, on dual roles (for example, when therapist and client know each other outside the office too), and on physical contact. These rules are not an expression of coldness or distance — quite the opposite. They are how the therapist says: “You are safe here, because I am taking responsibility for the frame.”
What boundary violations look like
A boundary violation occurs when the therapist — consciously or unconsciously — shifts the focus of the relationship from the client’s needs to their own, or blurs the clear professional frame in a way that harms the client.
Some examples are relatively obvious:
- a romantic or sexual relationship with a client — a form of violation that seriously damages trust and is prohibited by every code of ethics;
- a financial or business relationship with a client outside the therapeutic context;
- excessive personal disclosure by the therapist that shifts the focus away from the client and onto the therapist themselves;
- social contact outside sessions that creates a dual role (friendship, working together, and so on).
Other forms of violation are subtler and more easily go unnoticed — both by the client and sometimes by the therapist themselves. These include excessive physical closeness, accepting expensive gifts, sessions that run unusually long without a clear therapeutic reason, communication on social media that blurs professional distance, or situations in which the therapist unknowingly encourages dependency in the client rather than their autonomy.
It’s important to distinguish a boundary violation from flexibility within boundaries. Not every deviation from a strict protocol is harmful — sometimes briefly extending a session during a crisis, or a small gesture of humanity (for example, offering condolences after a loss), is part of ethical, context-sensitive care. The difference lies in the direction the action serves: does it serve the client and the therapeutic process, or does it serve the therapist’s own needs?
Boundaries as a form of care
Perhaps the most important thing to remember is that healthy boundaries are not a barrier to closeness in therapy — they are the very condition that makes real closeness possible. It is precisely because we know the frame is stable that we can allow ourselves to be fully honest within it.
When boundaries are not communicated clearly, clients can experience various degrees of frustration. Here are a few examples from practice that puzzle clients after our sessions have ended.
“Can we stay friends after I stop seeing you?” The answer is no. First, we were never friends — the sense of closeness is a product of the therapeutic relationship, whereas friendship presupposes reciprocity. We also cannot become friends because the end of the process does not mean the end of our therapeutic relationship. In my professional role, I have an obligation to remain available as a professional for some time afterward. Most codes of ethics specify a period of two years after the end of the process. This is part of the duty of care toward the client.
“I’d like to invite you to my anniversary/wedding/graduation/performance — will you come?” The answer, again, is no. Although in my professional role I have likely had an influence on your personal life, direct involvement in it outside the safe space of the office is not appropriate and is understood as a violation of ethical rules. While I understand the motivation behind the invitation, I am obliged to decline it.
“Will you see my husband/wife for a few sessions?” No. Individual work is individual work. When you are my client and I work with you individually, individual or family work with your partner compromises the core principle of the therapeutic relationship — confidentiality. That’s why it’s best for your partner to see a different therapist. And if you decide to pursue couples therapy together, I also cannot take you on as a couple while I am working with you.
These are just a few of the most common questions about boundaries. Most violations tend to happen in communication outside of sessions — sending messages with content unrelated to organizational matters, contact on social media, and, in small towns, behavior during chance encounters. Sometimes these rules allow for a certain degree of flexibility, but it’s always good practice to clarify why we’ve decided to show it.
If you ever sense that the boundaries in your therapeutic relationship have become blurred in a way that leaves you feeling confused, uncomfortable, or unhealthily dependent on your therapist, you have every right to ask questions about it — and even to seek another professional’s opinion. A good therapist will not be offended by such a question; on the contrary, they will welcome it as part of the care for your wellbeing.
Learn more about me and the cognitive-behavioral approach.
If you are a socially responsible business, see our offers for corporate clients.
For more topics from the world of psychology, follow my blog.
